itsnotmymind (
itsnotmymind) wrote2016-11-01 09:26 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
"Dean's Got It." - John Winchester
Brief exchange from Dead Man's Blood, while Dean is off getting the blood:
Sam: It shouldn't be taking this long. I should go help.
John: Dean's got it.
It cracks me up at John, who much of fandom is convinced had no respect for his older son, has absolute faith in Dean here. It really flies in the face of the two-dimensional take on John and Dean's relationship that many fans have.
The Winchester family dynamics are far more complex in those first couple of seasons than most people remember. Even the show writers themselves - Bad Boys fits in better with popular fanon about the Winchester than with family than what we saw in S1.
Don't get me wrong - I think John was a lousy father. I think his behavior in Something Wicked was criminal. But the fanon 2D monster who was unambiguously awful, who hated one or both of his sons, who was so neglectful as to leave the boys no better off than orphans...that has nothing to do with the man I saw on the screen in S1 and S2. It has nothing to do with how he interacted with his sons, and they with him.
Sam: It shouldn't be taking this long. I should go help.
John: Dean's got it.
It cracks me up at John, who much of fandom is convinced had no respect for his older son, has absolute faith in Dean here. It really flies in the face of the two-dimensional take on John and Dean's relationship that many fans have.
The Winchester family dynamics are far more complex in those first couple of seasons than most people remember. Even the show writers themselves - Bad Boys fits in better with popular fanon about the Winchester than with family than what we saw in S1.
Don't get me wrong - I think John was a lousy father. I think his behavior in Something Wicked was criminal. But the fanon 2D monster who was unambiguously awful, who hated one or both of his sons, who was so neglectful as to leave the boys no better off than orphans...that has nothing to do with the man I saw on the screen in S1 and S2. It has nothing to do with how he interacted with his sons, and they with him.
no subject
no subject
The impression I get was that the writers became very attached to the Bobby character, so writing him as surrogate dad, as well as not having JDM available for filming, all added up to John losing out every time when it come to the "Winchester Dad" comparisons
I wasn't the characters biggest fan, but he went out on a good note in season 2 IMO, and his last interaction with Dean was very positive and an attempt to make amends, so it is a shame how one-note the writing has become for him since then. Aside from appearances with younger John I guess
no subject
I am not a fan of Bobby as a surrogate Dad. He clearly wasn't a father figure when they were growing up, and he doesn't even relate to them as a father when they are adults. Yes, he says he's their father, and Dean says it, too, but they don't treat him like a parent. They treat him like just another adult.
no subject