Date: 2017-10-21 09:08 pm (UTC)
Yeah, as I said, I don't hold Ringo responsible for actions committed at age eight under the influence of other (likely older) children. But to say it is not sexual assault because of Ringo's lack of understanding of his actions erases the experiences of the girls who were hurt. Was being touched sexually, apparently against their will, not assault just because the kid assaulting them didn't understand what he was doing?

Ringo's description is pretty sparse, but it sounds like the two girls who told their mothers felt that the touching was something done to them, not something they had agreed to. I can't believe the sister was happy to be touched by all her brother's friends. Ringo was not guilty of a crime, but it sounds like the girls had the very real experience of being sexually touched against their will. So I feel like to say it is NOT sexual assault prioritizes the perspective of the male child and ignores the perspectives of the female children who have been victimized regardless of what the boy understood.

(Obviously, I can't say 100% certainty that the girls didn't consent because although it sounds like they didn't, Ringo doesn't spell it out. The fact that adult Ringo doesn't even seem to give a thought to the girl's consent appalls me much more than his actions at age eight.).
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

itsnotmymind: (Default)
itsnotmymind

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 07:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios